So now what? We looked at several other states and found that in Chicago and New York City, authorizers actively recruit new providers, offer one-on-one consultations with applicants, and interview the leadership teams of each school.[i] In addition to these strategies, DC could become more “hands-on” by offering workshops to address hurdles in school planning and by creating an iterative application process that includes feedback and support at each stage. In Massachusetts, where the charter schools consistently outperform public schools, an outside non-for profit organization coaches candidates through the application process.[ii]
These are just a few of our beginning suggestions as to how DC could start improving at the very beginning of the charter process. Make sure competent individuals, with relevant experience, are applying, and if they are not, seek them out. Once individuals have applied, or are interested in doing so, coach them through the process. Offer feedback and support at each stage of the planning so that when those school doors open, that staff is as prepared as possible to give the students of the District of Columbia the education that they deserve.
[i] Destler, K. (2009). Contrasting approaches to charter school oversight. Center on Reinventing
Public Education, Retrieved from http://www.crpe.org/cs/crpe/view/csr_pubs/277
[ii] School Start-up. (2007). Massachusettts center for public charter school excellence. Retrieved (2010, March 1)
from http://www.mccpse.org/scho.html
No comments:
Post a Comment